Conducted between 2022 and 24, it aims to expand the scope of the annual World Happiness Report, which often features Nordic nations as the world’s happiest countries. But that barometer does not capture the “fullness of well-being”, the scientists behind GFS – Byron Johnson, Tyler J. VanderWeele and Brendan Case – wrote in an op-ed in The New York Times on April 30.
“These rankings reinforce a key supposition of our globalised political and economic order: poor countries are unhappy because they are poor, and wealth is a critical precondition for individual and societal flourishing,” the scientists wrote.
“The three of us conceive of happiness, or flourishing, more broadly: as a state of affairs in which all aspects of your life are relatively good, including the social environments in which you live.”
