WASHINGTON: Global markets are getting too comfortable with risks like trade wars, geopolitical tensions and yawning government deficits, which, combined with already overpriced assets, increase the chance of a “disorderly” market correction, the International Monetary Fund said on Tuesday.
Underscoring the IMF’s warning, President Donald Trump’s revived threats on Friday to hike tariffs on China stoked investor fears of a major asset price correction. The comments sparked a sell-off in US stocks and sent bitcoin tumbling.
Despite this recent volatility, markets have mostly been resilient since April, when Trump unleashed his trade war, underpinned by expectations of monetary easing in most major advanced economies. However, this market optimism masks the potential damage from tariffs and high government debt. The IMF warned that the close ties between banks and less-regulated financial firms could amplify these risks.
“Beneath the calm surface, the ground is shifting in several parts of the financial system, giving rise to vulnerabilities,” the body wrote in its semiannual Global Financial Stability Report.
“Valuation models indicate that risk asset prices are well above fundamentals, increasing the probability of disorderly corrections when adverse shocks occur,” it wrote. Despite some negative economic data, equity and corporate credit valuations are “fairly stretched” as enthusiasm over AI mega-cap stocks drives historic stock market concentration. That creates the risk of a “sudden, sharp correction” if expected returns fail to justify lofty valuations, the IMF said.
Asset Prices Signal Dangerous Bubble Territory Analysis of sovereign bond markets also highlights growing pressure from widening fiscal deficits on market functioning. While bond markets have been mostly stable so far, abrupt jumps in yields could strain bank balance sheets and pressure open-ended funds like mutual funds, the IMF said. US bond markets sold off last month as concerns about global fiscal health escalated, although the pain was quickly reversed and bonds rallied on weak economic data.
The IMF added that central banks should remain alert to tariff-driven inflation risks and take a cautious stance on monetary easing to minimize further valuation spikes in riskier assets. Central bank independence is “critical” for anchoring market expectations and allowing those institutions to fulfill their mandates, it added, without referring to a specific institution. Trump’s attacks on Federal Reserve policymakers are emerging as the biggest threat to central bank independence in decades, sparking worries among central bankers worldwide, Reuters reported in August.
The IMF also called for “urgent fiscal adjustments” to curb deficits and ensure resilient bond markets.
Nonbank Financial Firms Create Contagion Risk
Heightened interconnectedness between banks and the more lightly regulated nonbank sector would amplify any shocks stemming from sectors such as private credit or cryptocurrencies, the IMF said. The group for years warned about patchy nonbank oversight but cautioned on Tuesday that the sector – which includes insurers, pension funds and hedge funds – continues to grow and now holds roughly half of the world’s financial assets. In the United States and Europe, many banks have nonbank exposures that exceed their high-quality loss-absorbing capital, the IMF said.
Roughly 10% of US banks and 30% of European banks would experience a substantial hit to their capital if nonbanks drew down all their credit lines, according to an IMF analysis.
“Vulnerabilities in the nonbank sector are interconnected,” the IMF wrote. “They can quickly transmit to the core banking system, amplifying shocks and complicating crisis management.”
The body urged policymakers to adopt a more comprehensive approach to assessing these less visible risks, particularly around interactions between banks and nonbanks. Echoing European policymakers, the IMF also called on governments to adopt a comprehensive policy response to crypto assets, including stablecoins, the adoption of which could weaken a government’s control over its own currency and disrupt the traditional banking system.
