The students were told by their teacher in a briefing for a module on health, disease outbreaks and politics at the School of Social Sciences that the use of ChatGPT and AI tools was not allowed in the “development or generation” of their essay proposal and long essay, according to pictures of the slide that were published online.
One student’s appeal was being processed before a review panel that would include AI experts, while the other two scored zero for the assignment, local media reported. The students used online tools to organise their citations. The two who have been punished used ChatGPT in their research but said they did not use it to write their essays, according to local media outlet CNA.
Fong Wei Li, a lawyer at Forward Legal who specialises in internet and social media law, told This Week in Asia that the saga showed the gaps in processes among universities in dealing with such disputes between teachers and students.
“Most universities acknowledge that Gen AI is part of our lives, but what universities don’t go further in doing is consistent framework about processes for grievances; if a faculty accuses a student of using Gen AI and the student disputes it,” Fong said.
“There has not been a critical mass for these kinds of disputes, but do we want to wait for something to happen like it did at NTU before there is a process if a student disputes?”
