Close Menu
World Economist – Global Markets, Finance & Economic Insights
  • Home
  • Economist Impact
    • Economist Intelligence
    • Finance & Economics
  • Business
  • Asia
  • China
  • Europe
  • Economy
  • USA
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Highlights
  • This week
  • World Economy
    • World News
What's Hot

What’s the future of Hong Kong stablecoins? A cross-border payment tool, insiders say

June 5, 2025

Next-generation battery expert Zhou Jianbin leaves US for China as nations seek tech edge

June 5, 2025

Trade war a bigger challenge for emerging market central banks than Covid, says IMF’s Gita Gopinath

June 5, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Thursday, June 5
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
World Economist – Global Markets, Finance & Economic Insights
  • Home
  • Economist Impact
    • Economist Intelligence
    • Finance & Economics
  • Business
  • Asia
  • China
  • Europe
  • Economy
  • USA
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Highlights
  • This week
  • World Economy
    • World News
World Economist – Global Markets, Finance & Economic Insights
Home » Govt challenges Nepra’s approved KE multi-year tariff – Business
Economist Impact

Govt challenges Nepra’s approved KE multi-year tariff – Business

adminBy adminJune 3, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link
Post Views: 7


ISLAMABAD: The government challenged K-Electric’s multi-year tariff (2024-30) approved by the power regulator last week, alleging the utility got an undue favour of Rs750 billion over the seven-year period at the cost of the national exchequer, power consumers across the country and taxpayers at large.

In a statement, the power division announced that the six tariff interventions allowed by the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) to KE entailed a financial impact of Rs453bn spread over seven years.

On top of that, the division added, a fuel cost impact higher than the national average for 2024-25 alone meant an additional cost of Rs41bn, which even if it remains flat would translate into Rs287bn in seven years.

The division said the government position was to seek review of the Nepra determination to ensure fairness and uniformity, tariff must reflect actual costs and reasonable returns to protect consumers and there should be no extra allowance for inefficiency.

“All utilities should be treated equally. KE should not receive special cost or profit allowances unavailable to other power companies,” the power division said, adding that “extra allowances for inefficiency and high profit rates must be removed to keep bills affordable”.

Regulatory accountability

At the same time, the power division called for regulatory accountability, besides revision in assumptions, benchmarks, and profit margins so that they align with real performance data and the standards used for other utilities.

It said the KE was allowed losses build-up it did not actually incur with a seven-year financial impact of more than Rs200bn and stressed that only actual losses following a due write-off process should be allowed.

The government has also challenged a two per cent allowance for law & order specific to KE with a seven-year impact of Rs99bn, followed by yet another major Rs83bn allowance for capacity payments for unutilised expensive plants of KE.

It said the regulator had been asked to revisit its recent approval of “several cost items and profit margins for KE that are higher or more favourable than for any other utility in Pakistan, resulting in unnecessarily high bills for consumers and extra pressure on public finances”.

It said Nepra had allowed inflated fuel cost benchmark to KE at Rs15.99/kWh, significantly higher than the national grid that shifted about Rs28 billion (FY24) and Rs13bn (FY25) of extra costs onto the federal budget rather than KE customers.

This perk was not granted to any other utility, even those operating in equally or more volatile regions, including Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan.

“Moreover, law & order in Karachi has improved considerably over the last few years, and thereby there exists no reason for a such a margin,” it said.

Working capital allowance

The power division also questioned the working capital allowance permitted to KE at 24pc markup, a much higher percentage than in its previous tariff and higher than any other power distributor. “This increased KE’s allowable revenue by about Rs2.4bn in FY24 and is projected to total around Rs15bn over the control period.”

The power division said Nepra set KE’s allowed loss at 13.90pc, instead of the 13.46pc KE had proposed. These losses are on account of electricity generated but not billed, due to leaks or theft, or Kunda (illegal connections).

Around seven per cent of all such leakages can be attributed to theft, which translated into an extra Rs3.1bn burden in FY24, rising to about Rs21bn over the control period.

The power division said Nepra had allowed to KE retention of “Other Income” charged from fines imposed on its contractors, interest on bank deposits, and profits from side businesses.

KE briefing

K-Electric’s Chief Executive Officer Moonis Abdullah Alvi on Monday said the proposed MYT would not place any additional burden on consumers.

Speaking to journalists at a corporate briefing at PSX, he said under a uniform national tariff policy electricity consumers across the country pay the same rates. “There will be no special hike for Karachi consumers under MYT,” he emphasised.

Published in Dawn, June 3rd, 2025



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
admin
  • Website

Related Posts

Economist Impact

State minister for crypto, Trump official discuss strategic alignment on digital assets – Pakistan

June 4, 2025
Economist Impact

‘Flawed’ govt policies cause sharp contraction in major crops – Business

June 4, 2025
Economist Impact

Fertiliser makers, association fined Rs375m – Business

June 4, 2025
Economist Impact

Committee tasked with digitising fuel payments – Business

June 4, 2025
Economist Impact

Senate panel urges infrastructure for EVs – Business

June 4, 2025
Economist Impact

Aptma seeks review of export scheme – Business

June 4, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

‘ST imposition under EFS will sabotage export industry’ – Business & Finance

June 5, 2025

KAPCO signs TPPA with CPPA-G, NGCPL – Markets

June 5, 2025

Telecom sector seeks sales tax reduction on services – Business & Finance

June 5, 2025

NEC approves national development budget worth Rs4.22trn for next fiscal year – Pakistan

June 4, 2025
Latest Posts

State minister for crypto, Trump official discuss strategic alignment on digital assets – Pakistan

June 4, 2025

‘Flawed’ govt policies cause sharp contraction in major crops – Business

June 4, 2025

Fertiliser makers, association fined Rs375m – Business

June 4, 2025

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Recent Posts

  • What’s the future of Hong Kong stablecoins? A cross-border payment tool, insiders say
  • Next-generation battery expert Zhou Jianbin leaves US for China as nations seek tech edge
  • Trade war a bigger challenge for emerging market central banks than Covid, says IMF’s Gita Gopinath
  • Hong Kong stocks rise for third day as China’s services PMI beats expectations
  • Hong Kong stocks rise for third day as China’s services PMI beats expectations

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Welcome to World-Economist.com, your trusted source for in-depth analysis, expert insights, and the latest news on global finance and economics. Our mission is to provide readers with accurate, data-driven reports that shape the understanding of economic trends worldwide.

Latest Posts

What’s the future of Hong Kong stablecoins? A cross-border payment tool, insiders say

June 5, 2025

Next-generation battery expert Zhou Jianbin leaves US for China as nations seek tech edge

June 5, 2025

Trade war a bigger challenge for emerging market central banks than Covid, says IMF’s Gita Gopinath

June 5, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Archives

  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • June 2024
  • October 2022
  • March 2022
  • July 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2019
  • April 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2007
  • July 2007

Categories

  • AI & Tech
  • Asia
  • Banking
  • Business
  • Business
  • China
  • Climate
  • Computing
  • Economist Impact
  • Economist Intelligence
  • Economy
  • Editor's Choice
  • Europe
  • Europe
  • Featured
  • Featured Business
  • Featured Climate
  • Featured Health
  • Featured Science & Tech
  • Featured Travel
  • Finance & Economics
  • Health
  • Highlights
  • Markets
  • Middle East
  • Middle East & Africa
  • Middle East News
  • Most Viewed News
  • News Highlights
  • Other News
  • Politics
  • Russia
  • Science
  • Science & Tech
  • Social
  • Space Science
  • Sports
  • Sports Roundup
  • Tech
  • This week
  • Top Featured
  • Travel
  • Trending Posts
  • Ukraine Conflict
  • Uncategorized
  • US Politics
  • USA
  • World
  • World & Politics
  • World Economy
  • World News
© 2025 world-economist. Designed by world-economist.
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.